I hope you realized that the movie is a comedy right?

I hope you realized that the movie is a comedy right?

It wasn't really funny. =/

I laughed at it a couple times, but not ever with it. Maybe it would have been slightly entertaining if it wasn't two and a half hours long...

I hope you realized that the movie is a comedy right?

Wait, what?

-K

I did the same with Avatar.

I did the same with Avatar.

Except Avatar's effects were impressive and not depressing.

2012's effects were impressive and depressing.

It was supposed to be a comedy?

Oh dear.

No, it wasn't. He was just making a joke.

But I liked it.

It had no plot, and the characters were very boring, but the destruction was all that I cared about. B)

I feel so bad for the Russian pilot. I loved his accent ;__;

~U_K~

I was being semi-serious. Half-way through the limo chase all the main characters should've been long dead, so from then onwards I was trying not to laugh aloud at the impossible luck they had and the stunts that could never work.

The drove through a collapsing office building in a limo, out-drove a mega-volcanic eruption (and it's fireballs) in an SUV, they landed a Jumbo jet in a mountain, the list goes on.

I think it sucked. It was depressing, didn't have much story/plot, stunts were too unrealistic, etc. But I think the special effects guys have mastered making the effects of explosion and destruction.

What a movie like 2012 is really about is putting you in the fear zone over stuff that will never even happen. :-/

~BCii

I'm pretty sure 2012 was supposed to be depressing.

I officially rated it the best worst movie ever.

And honestly, the entire thing is unreal. Like, scientifically. Los Angeles (where I live, by the way >>) wouldn't sink into the ocean. The San Andreas Fault is a transform boundary, not a divergent boundary.

-SK