If your characters are the only one's cause the problem, the only ones a threatened by the problem, and the ones who are going to solve the problem what's the point of getting involved at all? This is an roleplaying game, not one an epic, and the point of a roleplaying game is to word with other players to create a story together; If you are the only one that has any effect on it then the whole purpose is defeated, and so you'd probably be better off writing a novel or a short story, because the things that actually differentiate them are gone.That's why I've been intentionally ignoring this whole thing, because frankly, why am I do care about a certain plot if one group of underdeveloped characters and another group of underdeveloped characters both controlled by the same person are the only ones that can actually move it along?Answer: There unfortunately isn't one. Even if you (Not Tabby specifically, the rhetorical "you".) were the greatest writer on the whole game, It'd still be bad RPing.Look at the stuff plot, or EW's stuff with the Peers, or the Mark Bearers for instance: All of them are/were run by a single person, yes, but other people also affect what happens. The Peers have Bad Company, which is composed of a lot of people besides EW, involved in their plans. The staff plot has the Wanderer's Company, of course, but other groups have also effected it, like the ILF or FoM. The entire Mark Bearers plot consisted of the complications created by so many different characters interacting. That is how plots are done. Not with dozens of characters that basically exist only to fight each other.Basically, involve your fellow players, because otherwise we won't give a dang,