Jump to content

Planetperson

Premier Members
  • Posts

    1,033
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

Blog Comments posted by Planetperson

  1. There is simply nothing grammatically incorrect about it.

    I know, it's a matter of style. Writing is art, so there's no way to be "incorrect" about it. But writers generally agree that by default you should choose active over passive, just as a painter might advise against leaving too much negative space in a composition.

     

    There have to be some people who read in such a way that how action is dictated affects their impression of it and other people who accept action for what it is and don't care if it's narrated in either voice.

  2. People who tell you not to use it in a paper "because it's less active" or something like that should not be listened to.

    People who tell you not to use it in a paper and are going to grade it that way should :P .

     

    Really, I agree with active > passive. There are some times when passive is more appropriate, such as in tragic incidents like "John was sniped down in Iraq." But I consider it way better to say "John kicked the ball" rather than "The ball was kicked by John." John is a person. He's the one who acts. You shouldn't focus on the fact that the ball is on the receiving end of the action; it's assumed as long as you are told someone is kicking it. The nature of narrative is to describe action. There's no need to reiterate the fact that for push there is a pull.

     

    But if you believe you can write good stories without consciously avoiding passive voice, go for it. B)

  3. I appreciate your saying this. People should know that self-assurance in clinging to these skills can be an attractive quality. If you're a sniveling twerp about people finding out you like Lego, you give them reason to think you're interest is obscene. The cool people are the ones who know who they are and are not afraid to show it.

×
×
  • Create New...