Jump to content

-Toa Lhikevikk-

Premier Outstanding BZP Citizens
  • Posts

    2,988
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Blog Entries posted by -Toa Lhikevikk-

  1. -Toa Lhikevikk-
    Judge me by my sanity, do you? Hmmph.
     
    Allow me to state that I am insane. A truly insane person would not think themselves insane, so as I have just stated that I am insane, it stands to reason that I am not insane. However, by disproving my insanity, I deny that I am insane, so the possibilty still remains that I am indeed insane. A person can either be sane or insane, there is no other alternative because if one is not sane, by definition they are insane. If one is not insane, by definition they are sane. If one declares themslves to be of one state, they add evidence that they are of the opposite state, because an insane person cannot recognize that they are insane. Because of this, I simply cannot judge my own sanity. If I were to ask you to judge my sanity, I could neither agree nor disagree with you because to do so would be to judge my own sanity, which is impossible. Due to my inability to ascertain the soundness of your judgment, I would then not be of sound judgment, and by definition, would be insane. However, I would then be forced to recognize my own insanity, thereby disproving that I am insane. As a result, not only is it impossible for me to judge my own sanity, neither can anyone else. Because this is irrefutible logic, if anyone should think that they could judge my sanity, they would not be of sound reason and almost certainly be insane. Because some may not recognize this, as an outside observer I can with certainty determine the sanity of anyone else.
     
    In other words, no one has any right or reason to call me insane, yet I have every right and reason to call other people insane, because this is irrefutible logic.
     
    (I came up with this while holding a conversation with an imaginary psychiatrist, BTW.)
  2. -Toa Lhikevikk-
    Or did I lose a category?
     
    All the ones I made a year ago are still there... but the number seems to have dropped.
     
    In other news, the new BZPRPG is up now, and I'll be leading a bunch of McGuffin-ish missions. Also, I've finally reach the part of the epic climax in my Blink spoof. (Yes, I'm still working on that. Shocking!)
  3. -Toa Lhikevikk-
    Who knew that a Central American fruit could rob you of dreams and drive you insane?
     
    Entry title edited, as it contains info that should be spoilered for a few more days.-Nukaya
     
    EDIT: Considering the spoiler period is over now, I've reverted it to the original title and bumped, if that's okay.
     
    Totes okay now.-Nukaya
  4. -Toa Lhikevikk-
    "If at first you don't succeed, try, try again!" --English proverb
     
    "Insanity is trying the same thing over and over and expecting a different result." --Albert Einstein
     
    Basically, if at first you don't succeed, go crazy.
     
    (Also that skydiving joke got old long time ago. Don't bother posting it.)
  5. -Toa Lhikevikk-
    I was going to do a Dalek Appreciation Day-related entry on Tuesday but I forgot. >_<
     
    Oh well. We can appreciate them today. Appreciate! APPRECIATE! APPRECIATE!
     

     
    For he's a jolly good Dalek, for he's a jolly good Dalek...
  6. -Toa Lhikevikk-
    I was starting to miss being -Toa Lhikevikk-.
     
    In other news, my mom disappeared for the holidays and I discovered the cold fusion formula.
  7. -Toa Lhikevikk-
    BIONICLE was a constraction figure line.
     
    BIONICLE stopped selling well.
     
    BIONICLE ended as a result.
     
    Hero Factory is a constraction figure line.
     
    Hero Factory may or may not sell well.
     
    Hero Factory will end if it doesn't sell well.
     
    Hero Factory, in order to resurrect BIONICLE, must be boycotted, thereby proving to LEGO that constraction figures don't sell well so they can bring back a line that they will then know for sure won't sell well.
     
    Sound like a plan? B)

  8. -Toa Lhikevikk-
    So, as a casual researcher of conspiracy theories, I obviously hear a lot about the Illuminati.
     
    Can anyone explain to me what evidence there is that a philosophy club that presumably died out before 1800 still exists and is trying to take over the world?
     
    Seriously, if not even Wikipedia can give me anything, I seriously doubt that they have anything to do with anything. Freemasons? Maybe. Bilderberg Group? Perhaps. Skull and Bones? Dunno what some Yale fraternity wants with the world, but eh, anything's possible. But a late eighteenth-century philosphy club that never gets mentioned outside of conspiracy theories? First give proof they even exist before you go around insisting that everyone with any importance is part of it.
×
×
  • Create New...