Aanchir

The original "Cars" was fun and sentimental. The second "Cars" was still fun, but in a different way — it was mostly the creators just playing around with the characters and world through a "world tour" storyline. I enjoyed it, even though it didn't have nearly the same pathos as other Pixar flicks and is certainly not one I'd consider a favorite. If this trailer is anything to go by, they're taking Cars 3 in a more serious direction, but still no telling what the overall story will be about.

Wow, clever! As a kid I enjoyed making my own creations like Matoran and Toa using the sets as a template, and also loved collecting palette swaps of Bionicle parts from other themes. But I never even thought about other Bohrok-Va colors being possible! I guess it really takes someone who loves the Bohrok-Va to realize that kind of potential. I kind of wonder if another eye color like Tr. Fluorescent Blue (Trans-Medium Blue) or Tr. Bright Bluish Violet (Trans-Purple) might be better for this guy. One of the coolest things about the Bohrok in my opinion was how they all had eye colors that sharply contrasted with their primary and secondary colors. Then again, I guess Pahrak's Tr. Green eyes were sort of an exception to that. Your call!

Yeah, those pieces are sort of a mixed bag. On the one hand, they're a great shape, they intermesh really well at lots of different angles, and their flexibility makes them pretty versatile. On the other hand, their texture and blend of black and translucent colors don't match a whole lot of other pieces, so it's hard for them to "fit in" on a MOC unless it uses them as one of its defining motifs. Glad you like it! One of the things that sort of stymied me with this MOC is I only have 16 of those pieces: six blue, six red, and four green. Perhaps with a BrickLink order I could improve this MOC's color distribution, and maybe even spread some more color to the arms, but for various reasons it's not a convenient time for me to place an order. With that said, the MOC came before the name, so if they don't match that's more a fault of the name than a fault of the MOC. I struggled for quite a while to come up with a name I was happy with. Perhaps Hydrangea, a well-known color-shifting flower, might have been a more appropriate name? But while blue roses don't exist in nature, they're a common enough concept/symbol in fiction — for example, the Pokémon Roselia and Roserade carry red and blue roses. Thank you! Thanks! Hearing this means a lot. To be honest, I'm pretty self-conscious about how few MOCs I make these days, since I aspire to be a LEGO designer but to do so I know I'd have to be able to generate new ideas and designs a lot more reliably. This is only the second or third non-digital MOC I've built this year that I've liked enough to post. But it's good to hear that the MOCs I do post are worth the wait. The petals are this piece, and were used as cocoon segments in Hero Factory's final wave. The black bottom part is the same sort of softish plastic used for Bionicle weapons and 2003–2010 Bionicle masks, while the translucent upper part is a springy rubber. As I mentioned above, the shape and materials make it an interesting part to build with, but the colors and texture can be limiting.

They did license Minecraft (Swedish), Doctor Who (British), and Angry Birds (Finnish). So even though most of their licenses are American media properties, they have been branching out a bit more lately. Some brands I wish LEGO had picked up/would pick up include The Legend of Korra, The Adventures of Tintin, Steven Universe, Miraculous: Tales of Ladybug and Cat Noir, Voltron: Legendary Defender, The Legend of Zelda, Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney, and Professor Layton. Thanks to LEGO Ideas and LEGO Dimensions, LEGO has started to create sets and themes based on series that are not still ongoing, so LEGO hasn't totally missed their chance to make sets based on these properties. My Little Pony Friendship is Magic or My Little Pony Equestria Girls sets could be cool too, but I know those would never happen due to the rights belonging wholly to Hasbro, one of the LEGO Group's biggest competitors. I can't think of any brands that I wish LEGO didn't make into sets. Even the ones that don't appeal to me (like Jurassic World or Disney Princess Palace Pets) are generally still popular with someone, and there's no reason those people don't deserve themes they can enjoy. And the few themes that could be considered major failures, like Galidor, still taught LEGO powerful lessons about mistakes not to make in the future.

Gorgeous! Someday I hope you are able to make a full dragon at this scale — judging from what you've come up with here, it would be amazing! You did a great job hiding the joints while still keeping the posability intact. The shape feels very coherent without losing its scaly, organic texture. The purple inside the mouth is a creative touch that works very well. Even the base is really tasteful in its simplicity.

Why does biology matter? Romance is just a form of emotional attachment, and if Matoran and Toa are capable of forming friendships, then at least some of them should be capable of forming romantic relationships. I don't necessarily think Bionicle NEEDS romance, but I do think there's never been any justification for it NOT to have any that asn't paper-thin. And in fact, G1 Bionicle had plenty of hints of romance, they were just generally downplayed in the wider story, usually with the naive excuse that they couldn't lead anywhere. But in my opinion, Hewkii and Macku's mutual crush, Jaller and Hahli's budding romance, and Matau's flirtations with Nokama greatly enriched the stories they appeared in. The REAL reason romance is scarce in Bionicle, of course, has nothing to do with biology — it's that it's always been largely aimed at tween boys, and the prevailing stereotype about that demographic is that they think romance is gross. However, even this justification falls apart under scrutiny. Other LEGO themes aimed at basically the same age range as Bionicle, like Ninjago, Legends of Chima, and The LEGO Movie, have had canon and highly visible romantic subplots. So have plenty of other successful cartoons and animated movies aimed at more or less the same demographic. As long as romance does not overshadow the other parts of the story, it gives many fans another way to relate to the series and its characters, without taking anything important away from those fans who like the series for other reasons.

A fearsome, curvy LEGO Bionicle/Hero Factory villain I built this week. She stands 42 modules/33.6 centimeters/13.25 inches tall and has 26 points of articulation. Her name means "poisonous rose". Check out the Flickr album for more photos! Feedback welcomed!

Does he even answer Bionicle G1 things anymore? I mean, he's said some pretty... Do NOT bypass the filer. -B6 things about it after it ended. Didn't he burn all the bridges to focus on his silly little ninjas and whatnot? "His" silly little ninjas? Greg's scarcely any more involved with Ninjago than he was with Hero Factory or Exo-Force. I believe his main job with LEGO is still as an editor for LEGO Club and the catalogs (which I believe was also his primary job during G1 as well, even if it isn't what we knew him for). And I don't remember him saying any condemning things about Bionicle G1. As far as I'm aware, he loved his time working on it. It's just that between his actual paying job and personal life, he wasn't able to keep writing unpaid serials. And once G2 came along he felt like resuming Bionicle stories completely unrelated to the current canon would end up generating confusion. He certainly still answers G1 questions to the best of his ability!

No. They fit on these. And they're tiny.

I don't think Yang's motivations are all that similar to Morro's or Garmadon's. Morro was mostly just bitter because he felt the Green Ninja title was promised to him, then taken away and given to somebody else. And Garmadon's motivation was a pretty general evil ambition/hunger for power, fueled at least in part by some perceived parental favoritism.

This was from one of the latest issues of Blocks Magazine, but I think it's just speculation on the part of the person writing the article. It's not in quote marks so it's not a statement by the designers they were interviewing. I don't have this issue but from what I hear from people who have read it, it doesn't actually provide much insight into Bionicle's cancellation, let alone its future.

It's true that the villain conflicts felt a bit weak, but I feel like this was more because of the story structure than the ninja's character development. Even though the ninja were stronger and smarter than the last time they'd defeated these villains, these were still top-tier villains they'd never had to face one-on-one. But the constant scene changes between six different ninja conflicts made the conflicts feel disjointed, without a meaningful amount of time or focus to get emotionally invested in the conflicts. And the varying tone of the fights added to this disjointed feeling — some of the fights were appropriately lighthearted and silly, but were somewhat awkwardly interlaced with more serious fights. The LEGO Hero Factory Breakout special in 2012 had a similar structure (switching between six characters on solo missions), and struggled in a similar way to tell a coherent story. I did enjoy seeing a lot of locations we haven't seen in a while, like the village of Ignacia, the Birchwood Forest, and the site of the Monastery of Spinjitzu. The non-fight scenes had a lot of emotional resonance, more than you typically expect of a Halloween special.

Hold up a sec. Don't start putting words in my mouth. I never once said canisters were "evil" or "environmentally dangerous". But they DO have a bigger carbon footprint than boxes. And as Bfahome points out, that's something LEGO cares about. It would be irresponsible of a company their size NOT to care. Not when caring is as easy as using cardboard, which has always served them well in their other best-selling themes. Being "a different type of LEGO" was definitely a good thing back in the late 90s, when other LEGO themes were genuinely struggling to stay relevant. But today, LEGO is one of the most popular toys on the market, not just for kids but also for teens and adults. So being "different" from other themes isn't necessarily the great thing it once was. And if kids can notice City or Ninjago or Speed Champions sets just fine in normal rectangular cardboard boxes, why wouldn't they notice the fancy hexagonal boxes that are different from all other LEGO packages?

I don't think Bionicle's end was because kids failed to notice the sets. Why should Bionicle need a completely unique style of packaging to get noticed when all other LEGO themes do not? LEGO Ninjago, City, Creator, and Technic sets sell just fine in plain rectangular boxes. LEGO Friends and LEGO Elves sets sell just fine in rectangular boxes with beveled edges. Bionicle G2 already had more unique box designs than ANY of those themes, or any other theme for that matter. If that wasn't enough to get them noticed, then chances are the problem didn't have anything to do with how the sets were packaged. Back when Bionicle G1 was around, it was not the only theme that had plastic canisters. The Dinosaurs sets, Knights' Kingdom buildable figures, Racers Tiny Turbos, and $5 Creator sets, among others, had similar packaging. But today LEGO has stopped using this type of packaging in general, not just for Bionicle. This is because it was more expensive and had a bigger carbon footprint to produce and ship than cardboard or plastic foil packaging. I don't understand why many people's idea of what Bionicle needed to succeed hinges on it needing special treatment or special gimmicks beyond what other themes its size get. Isn't that presupposing that it's less desirable to begin with than other themes? And if that were the case, why would LEGO have been motivated to invest more in it and not in other themes that could pay off much more handsomely?

That was actually a really clever idea though! I wonder if anybody has ever done that… The dragons and monsters from the Vikings theme had an interesting aesthetic. Because of using a fair number of Bionicle parts, they had a pretty stylized, almost mechanical look, even though they mostly stuck with parts that had smoother textures and curvier shapes. To me, that stylization almost made them feel like some sort of illustration come to life. I get a sort of similar feeling from many of Nuju Metru's "Dragon Lands" creations, even though those generally don't use Bionicle or constraction parts as extensively, and have a lot more care put into their proportions.

Oh gosh, they are cute! And they have so much personality! Great job!

If you're thinking what I think you're thinking... Miraculous Ladybug Lego YES. (fits stupidly well with Lego given her power is creation and all too). As excellent as that would be, sadly it'll probably be a few years before that has any chance of happening, seeing as LEGO just launched their DC Super Hero Girls license and might be hesitant to pick up a separate superhero license right after that. :/

I'll be enjoying other LEGO themes, enjoying other non-LEGO properties, and making occasional MOCs (probably including Bionicle/constraction ones). But everybody's going to have their own way of dealing with the absence of new official Bionicle sets and stories.

I'd be more excited for Elves constraction sets, but that's mostly due to having more of an attachment to that theme and its characters. I don't honestly know whether buildable dolls should use the CCBS, since the doll market doesn't seem to favor as rugged a look as the action figure market. If they did use the CCBS, part of me thinks that some "unclothed" portions of the dolls might should use new beams instead of standard beams + shells. This is especially true because the outfits of LEGO Friends and Elves characters generally have short sleeves or no sleeves at all, so full-size arm shells might feel out of place. I'm also curious how best to work in a creative/"free-building" angle. Armored, robotic, and non-human characters are somewhat easy to mash together into original creations. With human characters with lots of exposed skin, that's perhaps trickier without creating something that looks unnatural. It's true that the LEGO Star Wars buildable figures have less of a creative building angle than any previous series of buildable figures, with no alternate or combination models advertised anywhere. However, with an in-house, girl-oriented theme entering an unprecedented "buildable doll" market, there may be more pressure to prove that they're more than "kits designed to build one thing". A certain amount of fashion play is also often expected of dolls, so I think you'd also want any outfits to be somewhat customizable. Separate head and hair might work, but it could also might be costly since it could mean more new molds. I'm also curious what material the hair should be made from. Chances are you'd want it to be somewhat flexible, since most Friends and Elves characters have long hair and you wouldn't want that to limit the figures' posability. Actual doll hair would be the most flexible, but I know from experience that doll hair is a nightmare to keep neat, let alone to tame into character-accurate styles. Rubber might work, but could still be somewhat limiting. As far as play features are concerned, I'm not sure what would be ideal. LEGO Elves sets tend to emphasize "magic" with their play features. It might make the most sense to give the characters accessories with action features than to incorporate action features into the figures themselves. That could potentially help cut down on the "uncanny valley" effect. Overall, buildable dolls are a direction I definitely wouldn't mind the LEGO Group moving, even though I don't think the fashion doll market is growing as rapidly as it was a few years ago. There are a LOT of unanswered questions, though. And since I'm neither a girl nor somebody who grew up playing with dolls, I'm probably far from the most qualified person to answer them.

I don't think that necessarily counts since none of the stone sets in the second generation actually have brown as a primary color. They have Dark Orange, which is much more of an earth tone than, say, Bright Orange or Flame Yellowish Orange (and was one of the original '01 stone colors to boot). And considering that the "brown" of the original Pohatu was ALSO considered a shade of orange (Earth Orange, to be precise), I'd say Dark Orange qualifies. Earth Orange might be considered a shade of orange to the people at Lego and to individuals such as yourself, but to consumers it's just brown. I think that ought to be taken into consideration since you're trying to say sets of a specific color are selling better than they used to. Dark Orange most certainly is a more earthy tone than some of the other colors that were used for stone sets in G1, but it's still not Earth Orange, or as consumers know it, brown. It's still just as much a shade of brown as classic brown was. I've seen a LOT of Bionicle G2 reviews from people who don't know or care about the official color names that just call the primary color of Pohatu, Ketar, and the Protector of Stone "brown" or "light brown" (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, etc.) Anyway, as to the question in the first post, it honestly wouldn't surprise me if Lewa and Gali were shipped out to stores in a two-character mixed lots, and that store just happened to order more of them than the other Toa due to their lower price. I know stores had to order some Hero Factory characters in two-character mixed lots like that.

LEGO has made a LOT of sets containing dragons, especially in recent years. Brickset counts around 70 sets containing dragons, more than half of which were released in just the past five years. So out of curiosity, how many LEGO dragons do you have, and which ones are your favorites? Do you prefer molded dragons like the ones in LEGO Castle, or more brick-built ones like the ones from LEGO Ninjago and LEGO Elves? I'm not sure how many dragons I have from 90s Castle sets, but my twin brother and I have about 25 dragons from the past decade: the Kardas Dragon from LEGO Bionicle, Dragon Bolt from LEGO Hero Factory, twelve dragons from LEGO Ninjago, and eleven dragons from LEGO Elves. My overall favorites are Elandra the Queen Dragon from LEGO Elves and the Master Wu Dragon from LEGO Ninjago. I have a hard time choosing between them. Elandra is bigger and more lifelike, while Master Wu Dragon is more posable. Generally I prefer brick-built dragons over molded ones. A decade ago I might've had a different answer, but today there are lots of great hinge and curved slope pieces for building lifelike, posable LEGO creatures. Feel free to share your thoughts on LEGO dragons!

It's a hypothetical question. I don't think many people genuinely expect Funko to make these; the topic's just asking whether you'd buy them if they did.

Well, it's based on that same era of animation (the movie Yellow Submarine came out in 1968; Scooby-Doo, Where Are You! premiered in 1969).

Unlikely to pass review IMO. The original project is around as big as the Helicarrier set but not nearly as attractive or iconic. Perhaps a version redesigned by LEGO might have some sales potential, but not at this colossal scale.

You do know SW and Friends sets did co-exist with G1 sets back in the day right? Even Marvel sets if you really think about it, with those movie studio sets and G1 was still their flagship for some years, because they put effort into it. Whatever process was behind G2 clearly had something wrong, there were so many great stuff left on the floor cut out, and instead of backing Bionicle and treating it with the respect it should have gotten, since it pulled Lego out of the gutter back in 2001, they just tried to mimic 2001 watering it down heavily and not advertising it properly, to me that feels like they were not too eager to do this from the start. A reboot that could have been a glorious return of the phoenix that is Bionicle, rising from the ashes was nothing more than a cardboard cut out with some confetti in the end. Friends didn't exist as a theme until 2012, and neither LEGO Star Wars nor LEGO Super Heroes had the kind of media presence during G1 that they have today. That's what Ptah was talking about — not just the amount of other themes out there, but the amount of other themes with their own animated media. 2010, the year Bionicle G1 ended, was the first year that there were any LEGO TV specials or direct-to-DVD movies besides the Bionicle movies. Themes like Exo-Force and Power Miners were lucky to get a five minute animated mini-movie. Bionicle didn't need to fail for any of those things to happen. So I don't see why you'd think Lego would be any less disappointed with its failure than the fans are. From the start Bionicle was given a shoe string budget (and most was probably blown on those gold masks) to work with and that showed from the quality of the web animations while Nexo Knights and Ninjago started off with their own TV series from the get go, and the Netflix "series", Journey to One, wasn't anything to write home about, it was heavily rushed riddled with errors. Not to mention the terrible business decision of not even trying to advertise it like the other lines but instead "leave it up to the older fans" as they put it to market it for kids. Um, there's no way the gold masks could possibly have taken up most of the budget. According to the Bionicle Mask Hunt Terms and Conditions, the gold masks given as prizes had a value of $160 each. That's not even 2% of the cost of a typical LEGO mold. Likewise, animation can cost thousands of dollars per minute of finished animation even for a fairly cheap production. Ninjago also did not start out with its own TV series from the get go. It started out with just a 44-minute TV special. Themes like Legends of Chima and Nexo Knights only started out with full TV series because Ninjago was so massively successful with one, and that gave LEGO the confidence to go ahead with full TV series for future "big bang" product lines. Likewise Ninjago probably only got the 44 minutes it did because the previous "big bang" theme, Atlantis, had done well with a 22-minute TV special the year before. Most of these themes were substantially larger in terms of number of sets per year and the net value of those sets than Bionicle G2. Now, do you know what did get a TV miniseries its first year? Hero Factory. And that didn't do nearly as well as Ninjago's TV special did, so I think you can see why neither LEGO nor TV networks were in a hurry to give a full series or miniseries to a product so similar. And bringing things back around to the subject of LEGO Elves, do you know what its first year story was told as? One 24-minute TV special. That's less than the full length of the 2015 Bionicle webisodes (though, admittedly, Elves also had five shorter webisodes in addition to that). Like Bionicle's 2015 webisodes, the Elves TV special was criticized for cheap-looking animation. It did have three voice actors for its nine characters instead of just one, though. In fact, in a lot of ways, LEGO Elves seems to have had a similar first-year budget to Bionicle. It had around 18 new molds compared to Bionicle's 27, eight sets totalling $265 compared to Bionicle's 18 sets totalling $270, one mobile app, one chapter book, and one activity book. It did have a semiannual magazine in Europe its first year, which Bionicle didn't get until its second, but still has had no graphic novels, no booth at any of the Comic Cons, no Facebook page, and certainly no high-profile competitions. All in all, Elves has had scarcely any more advertising than Bionicle (in fact, in some ways, it's had less), and yet it's still performing well. If anything, Elves is evidence that if a new theme truly resonates with its audience, then should be able to thrive even without a substantially larger budget than Bionicle was given.