Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Welcome to BZPower!

Hi there, while we hope you enjoy browsing through the site, there's a lot more you can do if you register. The process is easy and you can use your Google, Facebook, or Twitter account to make it even faster. Some perks of joining include:
  • Create your own topics, participate in existing discussions, and vote in polls
  • Show off your creations, stories, art, music, and movies and play member and staff-run games
  • Enter contests to win free LEGO sets and other prizes, and vote to decide the winners
  • Participate in raffles, including exclusive raffles for new members, and win free LEGO sets
  • Send private messages to other members
  • Organize with other members to attend or send your MOCs to LEGO fan events all over the world
  • Much, much more!
Enjoy your visit!

Posted Image


Photo

Official BS01/HS01 Wiki Topic


  • Please log in to reply
85 replies to this topic

#81 Offline Electric Turahk

Electric Turahk
  • Premier Member
  • Premier Outstanding BZP Citizens
  • The Tracer

  • 13,191 posts
  •   Outstanding BZPower Citizen

Posted Oct 12 2014 - 05:06 PM

I really wish there was some official name we could call these things. But that's not very likely, considering that LEGO seems to be avoiding complicated names.
 
Generation X seems awfully generic, and suppose a newbie doesn't even realize that there ever was a previous generation? I know that might not cause too much confusion anyway, but it feels as if there could be some more specific way to distinguish them.

This argument does not make sense at all to me.

As an example, consider a Transformers wiki. Should they delete everything every other year when a new cartoon comes out to cater to the new audience only? Absolutely not. A wiki is an encyclopedia. It is meant to document everything. So what if somebody whose first cartoon is the upcoming Robots in Disguise show doesn't know there was a cartoon back in 1984. Now they can find that out and learn more about it, should the choose. (As an aside, Generation 1 was a fan term to refer to said '84 show -- and was eventually adopted by Hasbro as an official designation! Because there was none to go by and it worked just fine. Of course, everything since then does have a subtitle and I sure wish that had been done with BIONICLE's resurrection, but alas LEGO opted not to.)

Or My Little Pony with its four generations. Young fans may not know that Friendship is Magic wasn't the first MLP. But they can find out more about the old ones if they want.

Generation 1 and Generation 2 seem perfectly descriptive to me. They are not too specific, but do at the same time clearly convey that there's more than one continuity.

~|ET|~

  • 0

E-T... Phone home.


"He walks among us, but he is not one of us."


#82 Offline fishers64

fishers64
  • Premier Member
  • Premier Outstanding BZP Citizens
  • Master of Poison Loose

  • 5,515 posts
  •   Outstanding BZPower Citizen

Posted Oct 12 2014 - 06:21 PM

Why can't you use Tahu(2001-2010) and Tahu (2015-Present)?

 

Then if we reboot again, Tahu (2015 - 2025) and Tahu (2025 - Present)? :P


  • 0

#83 Offline Lewigi

Lewigi
  • Premier Member
  • Premier Retired Staff
  • Senior Staff

  • 3,432 posts
  •   Retired Staff

Posted Oct 12 2014 - 08:43 PM

I was literally using X as a variable. It's currently separated by Generation 1 and Generation 2 (which I want to switch to Roman numerals, but people apparently disagree =P)

Yeah, I understood what you meant by X. I just feel as if there's some better way of doing it that I can't seem to think of.

 

If you're going with that, though, I like the idea of Roman numerals.

 

 

I really wish there was some official name we could call these things. But that's not very likely, considering that LEGO seems to be avoiding complicated names.
 
Generation X seems awfully generic, and suppose a newbie doesn't even realize that there ever was a previous generation? I know that might not cause too much confusion anyway, but it feels as if there could be some more specific way to distinguish them.

This argument does not make sense at all to me.

As an example, consider a Transformers wiki. Should they delete everything every other year when a new cartoon comes out to cater to the new audience only? Absolutely not. A wiki is an encyclopedia. It is meant to document everything. So what if somebody whose first cartoon is the upcoming Robots in Disguise show doesn't know there was a cartoon back in 1984. Now they can find that out and learn more about it, should the choose. (As an aside, Generation 1 was a fan term to refer to said '84 show -- and was eventually adopted by Hasbro as an official designation! Because there was none to go by and it worked just fine. Of course, everything since then does have a subtitle and I sure wish that had been done with BIONICLE's resurrection, but alas LEGO opted not to.)

Or My Little Pony with its four generations. Young fans may not know that Friendship is Magic wasn't the first MLP. But they can find out more about the old ones if they want.

Generation 1 and Generation 2 seem perfectly descriptive to me. They are not too specific, but do at the same time clearly convey that there's more than one continuity.

~|ET|~

 

I was in no way arguing that you delete all of the old info--that's ridiculous. I'm just talking about the naming methods.


  • 0

#84 Offline Meiko

Meiko
  • Premier Member
    BioniLUG Member
  • Premier Outstanding BZP Citizens
  • Nuhvok-Kal Attacks!

  • 3,067 posts
  •   Outstanding BZPower Citizen

Posted Oct 13 2014 - 12:18 AM

Why can't you use Tahu(2001-2010) and Tahu (2015-Present)?

 

Then if we reboot again, Tahu (2015 - 2025) and Tahu (2025 - Present)? :P

Because that gets confusing to read and keep track of, especially like you noted if there's a reboot again.

 

Here's to hoping LEGO doesn't do something ridiculous for "Generation 3" by making it a continuation of Generation 1 or something.


  • 0

--
Meiko
News reporter and database administrator at Brickset (profile)
Administrator at Brickipedia (profile)
Administrator at BIONICLEsector01 (profile)
 
DISCLAIMER: All opinions and contributions made under this account are based solely on my own personal thoughts and opinions, and in no way represent any of the above groups/entities. If you have any concerns or inquiries about the contributions made under this account, please contact me individually and I will address them with you to the best of my ability.


#85 Offline fishers64

fishers64
  • Premier Member
  • Premier Outstanding BZP Citizens
  • Master of Poison Loose

  • 5,515 posts
  •   Outstanding BZPower Citizen

Posted Oct 13 2014 - 12:20 AM

 

Why can't you use Tahu(2001-2010) and Tahu (2015-Present)?

 

Then if we reboot again, Tahu (2015 - 2025) and Tahu (2025 - Present)? :P

Because that gets confusing to read and keep track of, especially like you noted if there's a reboot again.

 

Here's to hoping LEGO doesn't do something ridiculous for "Generation 3" by making it a continuation of Generation 1 or something.

 

I actually think that's less confusing than "Gen X", but to each their own.


  • 0

#86 Offline Zox Tomana

Zox Tomana
  • Premier Member
  • Premier Members
  • Armored Protector

  • 310 posts
  •  

Posted Oct 29 2014 - 04:24 AM

Why can't you use Tahu(2001-2010) and Tahu (2015-Present)?
 
Then if we reboot again, Tahu (2015 - 2025) and Tahu (2025 - Present)? :P

Because we like to try and keep the page titles as simple as possible. Plus, the current way we're doing the pages requires the word "generation" so that the coding can shorten things down to just "Tahu." Also, while the year system may be more defining, it is inconsistent across pages. Dume was not around, story wise, in 2001, nor was Artakha, or the Glatorian. If, somehow, we had a 2015 Ackar, the old Ackar page would be, what? Ackar (2010)? That's not consistent with Tahu (2001-2010). That's a bunch of different year markers that could be seen to represent multiple stories instead of the single, Gen 1 story. I don't like Gen 1 much either, but it is currently the least of all evils. Some more ideas may be coming out about reorganizing, based on what Swert and I have been talking about (read: the thoughts Swert has been bouncing off me), so maybe Gen 1 won't have to stay around, but it is what is working in the simplest way thus far.

As to getting the new generation to the information it wants to see instead of the old stuff: all we have to do is default a search for "Tahu" or "Gali" or "Makuta" (that last one is more complicated) to the new generation pages. We old folks will need to take an extra step to view the old stuff, but that's okay with me, personally. Not that hard to click a button.

Edited by Zox Tomana, Oct 29 2014 - 04:26 AM.

  • 1




0 user(s) are browsing this forum

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users