Leaderboard

did i jsut soil myself? no . these are mood jeans that change color when i am sick of putting up with jokers such as your self THE COP GROWLS "TAKE OFF TH OSE JEANS, CITIZEN." I COMPLY, REVEALING THE FULL LENGTH DENIM TATTOOS ON BOTH LEGS. THE COP SCREAMS; DEFEATED who the heck is scraeming "LOG OFF" at my house. show yourself, coward. i will never log off BOSS TELLS ME I CAN KISS MY FERRETS AT WORK, BUT NO OPEN MOUTH. I PUNCH THE FLOOR SO HARD HIS SCREEN SAVER DEACTIVATES

i am notr, nor have ever been, a nerd, and i have used some very powerful swear words on this website that would blow most nerds socks off

the blue thumbtacks on this map indicate concentrations of high luna energy, the red ones are all the panera breads ive been banned from

im pretty much the Harlem Globe Trotter's of getting myself forcibly removed from laundromats

i will say this. when i finally ascend to the final plane of consciousness .nerds will get extremely yelled at

did i jsut soil myself? no . these are mood jeans that change color when i am sick of putting up with jokers such as your self THE COP GROWLS "TAKE OFF TH OSE JEANS, CITIZEN." I COMPLY, REVEALING THE FULL LENGTH DENIM TATTOOS ON BOTH LEGS. THE COP SCREAMS; DEFEATED who the heck is scraeming "LOG OFF" at my house. show yourself, coward. i will never log off BOSS TELLS ME I CAN KISS MY FERRETS AT WORK, BUT NO OPEN MOUTH. I PUNCH THE FLOOR SO HARD HIS SCREEN SAVER DEACTIVATES AS THE GUILLOTINE SLIDES TOWARD MY NECK, I PRODUCE A TINY BARBELL I'VE BEEN HIDING IN MY MOUTH AND LIFT IT WITH MY TONGUE. ONE LAST REP

You had me at "dress up as Link". Long hair can look really cool. Honestly, though, I find that most any hair looks cool and natural on anyone after a few days.

I bleached my hair a few months ago and dyed it blue. Some people in my classes (I share all of my classes with the same group of people) gave me a rough time about it (they did it again when I bleached it the second time). My advice: Just point out something about them; doesn't need to be abnormal or anything. Maybe just something like "you have freckles". And when they go "so what?" you go "exactly!" Some people are more stubborn in their intolerance for not-really-that-strange-hair-things than others, but it usually does the trick..

Haha! Nice. =P I was kinda surprised too. =\ Mostly it's coming from older generations, but other people my age have made comments about it too. It's weird. My parents' eyes practically rolled out of their sockets once I told them I intended to grow it nine inches, though. XD My dad was screaming "Hair only grows six inches per year!" over and over. XP

Why is that even an issue? If you want long hair than have long hair. It affects literally nobody else at all so why does anybody care?

My English prof for the last three semesters has long hair, he plans to grow it all the way down his back if he can get away with it.

I would say that's only worth subtracting one point.

You'd best keep off my lawn, then, Billy... >.>

^^oh man, yeah, vacuums too. At least I never hear them when I'm trying to study, though.

Definitely not a huge fan of lawnmowers, but vacuums are so much worse. They're just so... loud. And sometimes shrill which is even worse.

The very first thing MOCers did with the Nuva pieces (aside form build the Toa Nuva) was slap them on chests and call them pecs/breasts. The results were as terrible as what you are imagining.

Wait people have made Nuva Boobs back in 2002 :/ or was I reading that wrong.

Believe me, you are not the only ones who consider that, at best, to be annoying. That opinion stems back to 2002, when the Nuva first came out. It was a bad idea when Lego did it, it will never be a good design.

not to go against all of the cool things in this but i don't think kim jong-il is the credible source you want to be using as evidence of scientific advancements - Indigo Individual

No such name specifically, but a quick Google Scholar search shows plenty of research involving sideways shrimp by people in Societies interested in such things.

did i jsut soil myself? no . these are mood jeans that change color when i am sick of putting up with jokers such as your self THE COP GROWLS "TAKE OFF TH OSE JEANS, CITIZEN." I COMPLY, REVEALING THE FULL LENGTH DENIM TATTOOS ON BOTH LEGS. THE COP SCREAMS; DEFEATED who the heck is scraeming "LOG OFF" at my house. show yourself, coward. i will never log off

did i jsut soil myself? no . these are mood jeans that change color when i am sick of putting up with jokers such as your self THE COP GROWLS "TAKE OFF TH OSE JEANS, CITIZEN." I COMPLY, REVEALING THE FULL LENGTH DENIM TATTOOS ON BOTH LEGS. THE COP SCREAMS; DEFEATED

did i jsut soil myself? no . these are mood jeans that change color when i am sick of putting up with jokers such as your self

there is a time and a place for clowns and it is called "CIRCUS". not the computer

All the fun.

Once upon a time, women might have been less well-suited for certain tasks than men due to biological differences like having less upper body strength on average. Military combat is one of those. Today, most of those disadvantages are next to irrelevant. Most modern careers, including the military, don't require anyone to forcefully throw a spear or other heavy object, no matter what their sex. And since the differences in physical strength and other qualities between people of the same sex can be every bit as broad as the differences in physical strength between people of different sex, it makes no sense to treat sex as a qualifying factor in any non-sex-related job or position. Militaries and other organizations should just set the qualifications according to the actual requirements of the task in question, like how many pounds a person should be expected to lift on a regular basis. There's no point in disqualifying a candidate just because "on average" a person of their sex would have a harder time than a person of the opposite sex. With that said, a disclaimer: that also means employers shouldn't include secondary qualifications with the goal of eliminating a certain group of candidates (like setting strength requirements that few women can meet, regardless of whether those requirements are pertinent to the job in question). That's the same sort of slimy maneuvering as laws in the old South that required all voters to pass a literacy test. The people putting those laws into practice knew that they would disqualify more black voters than white voters (since at the time, black people were less educated on average, some of the literacy tests were intentionally be made to be preposterously difficult, and white voters would sometimes be arbitrarily exempted from the tests by local election officials). And no higher-level reading ability was actually necessary to vote in elections, since the burden of ensuring the voters know and understand either candidate's platform is supposed to be on the backs of those candidates, not the voters. So while these laws did not exclude either race at face value, they were still racist and discriminatory. The equivalent is true of rules that seek to discourage female candidates from a position in a business or the military. Seems like my disclaimer ended up being longer than the body of my post. My apologies.