It's one thing to not switch votes based on righteous feelings - except this was most definitely not righteous. The Bodyguard died, despite red flags going up that "hey, wait, maybe this isn't such a good idea after all". Despite the Representative, who had left out the first investigation, helping urge toward Taka. Despite Taka being confirmed guilty now. Is it really, then, that good an idea to stick to a bandwagon for no reason at all, especially when you can manipulate people into helping vote? Worst case scenario, you detract attention from Taka - Best case scenario, well, we just saw that. Now the only obstacle is the representative - not an entirely tough thing if the Prince so chose. Another thing - we don't know for certain Hellyam is guilty. Why do you think that? Smoke was in scene 2 as well; even if every sign is pointing against Smoke, it seems awfully specific to jump right to assuming we know Hellyam is guilty - multi-mafian suspect lists have happened before. Also, there's another thing; you're right, this is a rookie mistake. But what if the person was distracted? What if someone else decided the target, and then the person sent was decided after? Portal has had college, and I'm not sure about Jed1ndy, but Underscore has likely also been busy considering there were no votes in Round 3. But you have been busy too - with Hitman. It's perfectly easy to have made an oversight by accident; or even on purpose. After all, if you send out someone who absolutely shouldn't do a rookie mistake, in a situation where they'd make a rookie mistake... then that would shift blame to someone else, no? The scene also kinda hints toward that too - the theme of the scene was belief that since the Bodyguard was dead, that the Enforcer could then go and take out the Representative.