Jump to content

Scrash

Members
  • Posts

    561
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Blog Comments posted by Scrash

  1. Whenever I get to that point in the series, I suppose. =P

     

    I might just start on one of the later ones and see what becomes of it as I write Trial of Iron.

     

    Also, hope to chat with ya' soon; I had a thought, though I think it's best to run it by you and Xin first...

  2. I don't mind it, honestly. It's perhaps a bit overused (Fire Lord Ozai, BIONICLE's Elemental Lord of Fire), but I like the title "Lord." It's big, claiming power and authority over something, in the case of the Fire Lord... water.

  3. Also, "lame-named Fire Lord villain"?

     

    You seem to be forgetting the fact that the Fire Lord is the single best LEGO, MegaBloks, KNEX, etc... set ever produced. :bored:

     

    He would be the best thing ever, but women already exist....

  4. I enjoy the fact that we are trying to come up with a species name for the Glatorians, but I think we should come up with a name more suiting for a race of warriors such as something derived form the Greek word for Warrior, Polemistus. So I vote Nay to Article 253.

     

    I agree with Article 254, as it adds to our already rich back story.

     

    I like the idea of Article 255, and will vote Aye as it gives me nostalgia to how Matoran revered Mata Nui on the island of his namesake back in the glory days of the series, but I believe they should be less similar to the Elemental lords.

     

    Now this Article I do have a problem with. Whilst the initial idea is okay, I don't like the fact that the name and traditions were taken from the Illuminati organization featured in the movie "Angels & Demons". Believe me, my Epic idea isn't exactly creative, but I didn't call it Night of the Living Dead or 28 Weeks Later, from which I derive the idea from. I even go into such great lengths never to call the antagonists zombies, instead calling them the Undead, or Corpses. I will vote Aye if the name is changed to something more original. Until then I have to give Article 256 a Nay.

     

    Article 257 is another that I view as problematic. First off, how was a secretive war fought that featured powerful alliances between multiple species? I mean sure conflicts can happen under the cover of darkness, I mean look at the combat records for the Cold War, but I believe that this war would've been more public considering the masses endangered by the Illuminati who would've been given the ole' one two anyways considering they were going up against the most militant species in the universe. I have to give this one a Nay as well.

     

    I like the idea behind Article 258, and have to give it an Aye, especially because I love the League of Six Kingdoms lore.

     

    The idea behind this is quite cool if you ask me, and as long as the numbers of these elite warriors is limited, I give a resounding Aye.

     

    Ausar I absolutely love this idea. I've always wanted a Fungi tribe ever since participating in the RPG forum where a fungal jungle underground was featured.

     

    -Zee

     

    In response to the bold, not all of them are warriors, just the ten or so we met in 2009. Out of the perhaps hundred plus that could exist, I don't see why they should all be a part of a warrior-sounding species. Plus, we have Skrall for legitmate warrior society.

×
×
  • Create New...