Jump to content

Grantaire

Premier Members
  • Posts

    2,520
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Blog Comments posted by Grantaire

  1. So women have a different purpose then men? Women shouldn't be fighting?

     

    .....Nope. Nope. That speaks for itself honestly. I could say something, but it'd just detract from that.

     

    Ideally no one should fight, but that's not happening. We also have different views of the purpose of humanity, just because I believe one thing regarding holiness and eternity, and you believe another. Next, define fight. I could argue that a woman like St. Catherine of Siena did a better job fighting than most men, even though she never touched a weapon in her life. Fighting doesn't have to involve matter or weapons.

     

    Of course, it's obvious that you were referring to physical fighting. I could most likely make a long case for why I don't like the idea of woman in the military, or why I believe that men should fight in wars rather than women, but not only would it be rather edgy regarding BZP rules, but I also feel it would detract from the purpose of the blog entry. To add to that, this is not a position I can fluently defend. Defend, yes, but not fluently.

     

    Oh, hey Kraggh. I just wanted to let you know that I will be very mad if the other most beautiful female characters do not include Eponine. >=(

  2. I cannot say how much I agree with your points on the woman warrior concept. That, especially in the case of Black Widow always turns me off. Has some good elements, but overdone. I very much agree that how Catwoman is shown, or for that matter Snow White from Snow White and the Huntsman is a much better way of showing it; their nature and goal in life is not fighting. It's more like they fight because they're forced to. Yes, you may call me sexist if you want. I will laugh if you do.

     

    And of course, in my defense, male characters whose whole character is fighting also bore me.

  3. While Colm does a good job, He cannot match the emphasis Alfie makes (seriously, if I was voting for which Valjean's singing I'd match I'd vote for Colm, since I'm about as bad at adding emphatic emotion as he is). What Have I Done decided it for me: Alfie's version sounded like a piercing cry from the heart (I have finally found music that matches my emotions at times!) and fits well the phrase "...Nothing remains but the cries of my hate" while Colm's version sounded like a stunned murmur, although not bad. But Alfie's pierced to the heart, while Colm only cut through a few of the outer layers.

     

    So yeah:

     

    #team alfie

     

    Zarayna

  4. Good Lord, what did I just wade into?

     

    Let me put this in context: whenever I read something that I view as heretical, or even writing refutation such a belief, I periodically stop in the middle of things, and with burning eyes fixed on heaven either verbally or mentally refute the entire thing. If the writing is particularly irksome, I will seriously loath and utterly detest it.

     

    Anyways, after I read through all these comments I'll probably just roll my eyes and lock the thing.

     

    Also, hyperbole is awesome. I like dryly overstating things: it would probably take an entire book by Dawkins to make me feel sick to my stomach. One excerpt will just leave me with a bad taste in my intellect.

     

    Also guys, I am used to reading opposing viewpoints, anything from Protestant tracts to people arguing for machine rationality, or denying the existence of the self. I just really don't like Dawkins.

×
×
  • Create New...